求人情報

UniformDating visitors

D. Frischer, ‘Unravelling the purple thread: function word variability and the Scriptores Historiae ancora issue contains three articles by PNew

D. Frischer, ‘Unravelling the purple thread: function word variability and the Scriptores Historiae ancora issue contains three articles by P

079-423-2323

お問い合わせ

D. Frischer, ‘Unravelling the purple thread: function word variability and the Scriptores Historiae ancora issue contains three articles by P

While we should not overestimate the successo of modern techniques, the HA is too interesting verso case study sopra stylometry onesto be abandoned altogether

is not more variable than a raccolta constructed esatto mimic the authorial structure as outlined durante the manuscript tradition […] [T]he variability of usage of function words may be used as verso measure of multiple authorship, and that based on the use of these function words, the SHA appears sicuro be of multiple authorship.8 8 E. K. Tse, F. J. incontri uniformdating Tweedie, and B. J. and L. W. Gurney, and verso cautionary note by J. Rudman (see n. 10, below).

Most historians (though by mai means all) accept some version of the Dessau theory of scapolo authorship.9 9 See most recently D. Rohrbacher, The play of allusion con the Historia ) 4–6. Mediante the twentieth century, the most prominent voice calling the Dessau thesis into question was that of Per. Momigliano; see for example his ‘An unsolved problem of historical forgery: the Scriptores Historiae Augustae’ Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 17 (1954) 22–46. D. den Hengst is one scholar who felt the need esatto revisit the question of scapolo authorship subsequent puro the 1998 papers, suggesting that a naive sense of single authorship was per niente longer tenable; see ‘The tete-a-tete of authorship,’ durante the Emperors and historiography (Leiden 2010) 177–185, originally published con G. Bonamente and F. Paschoud, eds. Historiae ) 187–195. R. Baker has recently upheld verso multi-authorial view of the text, mediante his 2014 Oxford D.Phil. thesis, ‘Verso study of per late antique insieme of biographies [Historia Augusta]’. This disjunct between the evidence from historiography and traditional philology on the one hand, and computational analysis on the other, has seemingly led preciso verso devaluation of computational methods mediante classical scholarship, and made computational linguists reluctant puro rete di emittenti on Echtheitskritik of Latin texts.

Reynolds, G

Additionally, Joning critique of the state of the art mediante computational HA studies per the same issue of LLC con 1998 and few studies have dared preciso take up the case study afterwards.10 10 J. Rudman, ‘Non-traditional authorship attribution studies per the Historia Augusta: some caveats’, LLC 13 (1998) 151–57. Rudman’s critique is – sometimes unreasonably – harsh on previous scholarship, and addresses issues which are considered nowadays much less problematic than he believed them puro be per 11 Cf. Den Hengst, ‘The discussion’ (n. 9, above) 184. The problem of homonymy mediante word counting or minor reading errors per the transmitted manuscripts, onesto name but two examples, are niente affatto longer considered major impediments con automated authorship studies any more.12 12 M. Eder, ‘Mind your corpus: systematic errors con authorship attribution’, LLC 28 (2013) 603–614. Scholars generally have also obtained per much better understanding of the effect of genre signals or the use of preparazione corpora.13 13 P. Juola, ‘The Rowling case: Verso proposed canone analytic protocol for authorship questions’, DSH 30 (2015) 100–113. Most importantly, however, the widely available computational tools available today are exponentially more powerful than what was available per decina ago, and stylometric analysis has seen a tremendous growth and development.14 14 Ed. Stamatatos, ‘Per survey of modern authorship attribution methods’, JASIST 60 (2009) 538–556. One interesting development is that previous studies sometimes adopted per fairly static conception of the phenomenon of authorship, sopra the traditional sense of an auctor intellectualis. A wealth of studies per more recent stylometry have problematized this concept, also from per theoretical perspective, shedding light on more complex forms of collaborative authorship and translatorship, or even cases where layers of ‘editorial’ authorship should be discerned.15 15 See addirittura.g. N.B. B. Schaalje & J. L. Hilton, ‘Who wrote Bacon? Assessing the respective roles of Francis Bacon and his secretaries durante the production of his English works’ DSH 27 (2012) 409–425 or M. Kestemont, S. Moens & J. Deploige, ‘Collaborative authorship per the twelfth century: A stylometric study of Hildegard of Bingen and Guibert of Gembloux’ DSH 30 (2015) 199–224. As such, more subtle forms of authorship, including the phenomenon of auctores manuales, have entered the stylometric debate.

管理番号
所在地
雇用形態
職種
業種
就業場所
賃金
勤務時間

079-423-2323

お問い合わせ

ページの先頭へ